markam24 wrote:Well, no...i don't think he's having a unique problem due to any special coding. That is simply how google sees the gallery.
All the IV HTML pages, except (apparently) the actual individual image pages (in my experience) are indexed.
That, along with the fact that flash is simply not a good platform for SEO, means for optimal SEO results, a current IV host really needs other / better / independent means for driving traffic to an IV site.
An accompanying blog or linking from high traffic sharing sites such as flickr are good (probably the best) methods.
Intriguing, I'm actually trying to go through the process of making the site generically SEO friendly, very hard btw Karl/Pain when theirs lots of random .CSS files all over the shot...
Please try and consolidate this in X3...one .css file clearly organised would be a DREAM! Annotated would be a nirvana!!
I googled the "Oops - it appears you need flash / javascript" that appears for non-flash users. I'm here now to find / edit that page. The top 4 results are Imagevue! It makes white labeling this product nearly impossible. Which for certain license holders is great, but for commercial licensee's it's a nightmare!
The limitations for SEO don't end there either the directories can't be renamed, the flash elements, the ID's Tags and Classes, Some of the DataBase entries etc etc...
I think one of the major things that's important about X3 should be the flexibility to edit 99.9% of the elements that lead user's or google back to this site.
Anyway said too much already, I was only going to reply quickly, ended up waffling on.
SEO...Important stuff would like to here more! Stickies!!!!